1. The passing thing was a silly way to get the class to share their week. It took 20 minutes of class time to do simple introductions and explain the rules. I don't know if it was worth it.
2. It was fun to see the images that people found to represent themselves. It is also interesting in twenty-twenty hindsight that you built on this activity later with grouping.
3. Learning about Elive text tools was something I already knew how to do from experimentation with other classes (my professors ended up with a curious student who just randomly played with buttons on accident :) ) I didn't know, however, about active links in the paragraph box verses the inactive link in the single line box.
4. It never fails to strike me just how broad a subject Digital Citizenship is. Even after this whole semester of contemplating the idea and talking about it, the subject is quite difficult to wrestle with! My Literacy and Language class had a debate over the role of technology in the classroom and these very same topics came up! I put in my two cents about NETS-T, of course, so that other educators could see that there really were guidelines, but technology changes everyday. We need to have a board policy to handle that change.
5. I thought the discussion regarding 'Comment wars' (saying things nicely) was kind of funny. I have been amazed at how chat boxes in Elive sessions have turned into comment war zones! I have left classes this semester really passionate about a topic and gone to Facebook to continue the argument before! We need to learn how to take those comment wars and make them into genuine discussions.
6. NCATE moment: fairness. This moment was rather odd. I grew up thinking that 'life ain't fair' to quote my mother. I suppose that one needs to strive to be fair in the professional world, but everyday I make a decision to cut someone short just a little bit of fair. I can't help it. I wonder why the examiners in UAA are looking for fairness if that is next to impossible?